Best writers. Best papers. Let professionals take care of your academic papers

Order a similar paper and get 15% discount on your first order with us
Use the following coupon "FIRST15"
ORDER NOW

assignment annotation of a quantitative research article and discussion designing quantitative research

2 differents tasks to do, so please separate it by headings:

1-Assignment:
Annotation of a Quantitative Research Article

Submit: Annotation of a Quantitative Research Article

This week, you will submit the annotation of a quantitative research article on a topic of your interest.

Need assignment help for this question?

If you need assistance with writing your essay, we are ready to help you!

OUR PROCESS

Order

Payment

Writing

Delivery

Why Choose Us: Cost-efficiency, Plagiarism free, Money Back Guarantee, On-time Delivery, Total Сonfidentiality, 24/7 Support, 100% originality

An annotation consists of three separate paragraphs that cover three respective components: summary, analysis, and application. These three components convey the relevance and value of the source. As such, an annotation demonstrates your critical thinking about, and authority on, the source. This week’s annotation is a precursor to the annotated bibliography assignment due in Week 10.

An annotated bibliography is a document containing selected sources accompanied by a respective annotation of each source. In preparation for your own future research, an annotated bibliography provides a background for understanding a portion of the existing literature on a particular topic. It is also a useful first step in gathering sources in preparation for writing a subsequent literature review as part of a dissertation.

Please review the assignment instructions below and click on the underlined works for information about how to craft each component of an annotation.

It is recommended that you use the grading rubric as a self-evaluation tool before submitting your assignment.

  • Annotate one quantitative research article from a peer-reviewed journal on a topic of your interest.
    • Provide the reference list entry for this article in APA Style followed by a three-paragraph annotation that includes:
    • Format your annotation in Times New Roman, 12-point font, double-spaced. A separate References list page is not needed for this assignment.
    • Submit your annotation.

    2-Discussion: Designing Quantitative Research

    Researchers consider validity and reliability with each new study they design. This is because validity and reliability are not fixed but rather reflect a particular study’s unique variables, research design, instruments, and participants.

    In the context of research design, two types of validity, which speak to the quality of different features of the research process, are considered: internal validity and external validity. Assuming that the findings of a research study are internally valid—i.e., the researcher has used controls to determine that the outcome is indeed due to manipulation of the independent variable or the treatment—external validity refers to the extent to which the findings can be generalized from the sample to the population or to other settings and groups. Reliability refers to the replicability of the findings.For this Discussion, you will consider threats to internal and external validity in quantitative research and the strategies used to mitigate these threats. You will also consider the ethical implications of designing quantitative research.

    Post an explanation of a threat to internal validity and a threat to external validity in quantitative research. Next, explain a strategy to mitigate each of these threats. Then, identify a potential ethical issue in quantitative research and explain how it might influence design decisions. Finally, explain what it means for a research topic to be amenable to scientific study using a quantitative approach.

RESOURCES:

Babbie, E. (2017) Basics of social research (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.

  • Chapter 3, “The Ethics and Politics of Social Research”
  • Burkholder, G. J., Cox, K. A., & Crawford, L. M. (2016). The scholar-practitioner’s guide to research design. Baltimore, MD: Laureate Publishing.

    Rubric Detail

    Select
    Grid View or
    List View to change the rubric’s layout.

    Name: RSCH_8110_Week6_Discussion_Rubric

    Description: RSCH 7110 Discussion Rubric – RSCH 6110 Discussion Rubric


    Discussion Posting Content


    0
    (0%) – 10.4
    (34.67%)
    Discussion posting demonstrates poor or no understanding of the concepts and key points of the text(s) and Learning Resources. Posting is incorrect and/or shallow, and/or does not include any pertinent examples or provide sufficient evidence from the readings.

    10.5
    (35%) – 11.9
    (39.67%)
    Discussion posting demonstrates a fair understanding of the concepts and key points as presented in the text(s) and Learning Resources. Posting may be lacking or incorrect in some area, or in detail and specificity, and/or may not include sufficient pertinent examples or provide sufficient evidence from the readings.

    12
    (40%) – 13.4
    (44.67%)
    Discussion posting demonstrates a good understanding of most of the concepts and key points presented in the text(s) and Learning Resources. Posting provides moderate detail (including at least one pertinent example), evidence from the readings and other scholarly sources, and discerning ideas.

    13.5
    (45%) – 15
    (50%)
    Discussion posting demonstrates an excellent understanding of all of the concepts and key points presented in the text(s) and Learning Resources. Posting provides significant detail (including multiple relevant examples), evidence from the readings and other scholarly sources, and discerning ideas.

    Peer Feedback and Interaction


    0
    (0%) – 6.9
    (23%)
    Student does not interact with peers (0 points) or the response posting does not contribute to the quality of interaction by offering any constructive critiques, suggestions, questions, or additional resources.

    7
    (23.33%) – 7.9
    (26.33%)
    Response posting is fair and partially contributes to the quality of interaction but offers insufficient constructive critiques or suggestions, shallow questions, or provides poor quality additional resources.

    8
    (26.67%) – 8.9
    (29.67%)
    Response posting is good and partially contributes to the quality of interaction by offering adequate constructive critiques, suggestions, in-depth questions, additional resources, and stimulating thoughts and/or probes that draw from the readings and other scholarly sources.

    9
    (30%) – 10
    (33.33%)
    Response posting is excellent and fully contributes to the quality of interaction by offering substantive constructive critiques, suggestions, in-depth questions, additional resources, and stimulating thoughts and/or probes that draw from the readings and other scholarly sources.

    Writing


    0
    (0%) – 3.4
    (11.33%)
    Postings are well below graduate-level writing style expectations for organization, scholarly tone, APA Style, and writing, or show heavy reliance on quoting.

    3.5
    (11.67%) – 3.9
    (13%)
    Postings are somewhat below graduate-level writing style. Postings may be lacking in organization, scholarly tone, APA Style, and/or contain many writing and/or spelling errors, or show moderate reliance on quoting versus original writing and paraphrasing.

    4
    (13.33%) – 4.4
    (14.67%)
    Postings are mostly consistent with graduate-level writing style. Postings may have some small organization, scholarly tone, writing, or APA Style issues, and/or may contain a few writing and spelling errors.

    4.5
    (15%) – 5
    (16.67%)
    Postings are well organized, use scholarly tone, contain original writing and proper paraphrasing, follow APA Style, contain very few or no writing and/or spelling errors, and are fully consistent with graduate-level writing style.

    Total Points: 30

    Name: RSCH_8110_Week6_Discussion_Rubric

    Description: RSCH 7110 Discussion Rubric – RSCH 6110 Discussion Rubric

“Order a similar paper and get 15% discount on your first order with us
Use the following coupon
“FIRST15”

Order Now