case study about chevron corporation oil industry company atleast 3pages
I need to do the finish 2part below, case study about Chevron Corporation Oil industry company ( atleast 3 pages for 2 parts).
Part A. Defining the industry (see Besanko’s Chapter 5 powerpoint and Ch.5 classnote) … (atleast 1.5pages)
Need assignment help for this question?
If you need assistance with writing your essay, we are ready to help you!
OUR PROCESS
Order
Payment
Writing
Delivery
Why Choose Us: Cost-efficiency, Plagiarism free, Money Back Guarantee, On-time Delivery, Total Сonfidentiality, 24/7 Support, 100% originality
Part B. Analyzing the structure of the industry (Besanko’s Chapter 5 powerpoint and Ch.5 classnote) (atleast 1.5pages)
P/s: I attached perfect paper example below, also my Besanko’s Chapter 5 lecture, Ch.5 powerpoint. which contain all concept need to apply to paper, please review everything careful before start. Must provide table and number. All sources need to cite by APA format.
|
Written Case Study Rubric |
||||
|
Criteria |
Does Not Meet Expectations – Would earn a D or F (<70%) |
Meets Expectations for Earning a C (70-79%) |
Meets Expectations for Earning a B (80-89%) |
Meets Expectations for Earning an A (90+%) |
|
Analysis of Case (35 points possible) |
Case study indicates little research into the assigned company and industry. (0 to 23 points) |
Case study indicates a moderate amount of research into the assigned company and industry but misses key elements important to the case. (24 to 27 points) |
Case study indicates moderate to thorough research into the assigned company and industry, but lacks precision or depth in a few places. (28 to 30 points) |
Case study indicates excellent, thorough research into the assigned company and industry throughout the paper. (31 to 35 points) |
|
Application of Concepts (35 points possible) |
Describes/explains no or very few concepts from this course that are relevant to the case. Analysis is neither comprehensive nor in depth. Does not relate or shows minimal relationship of the theoretical concepts to the case. (0 to 23 points) |
Describes/explains a few relevant concepts from this course, but concepts are not discussed in depth. Analysis is comprehensive but lacks depth. Relates some theoretical concepts to the case. (24 to 27 points) |
Describes/explains several relevant concepts from this course. But concepts/ discussion are not integrated effectively into the case. Analysis is comprehensive with some analysis. Adequately relates to the central themes/topics and theoretical frameworks (28 to 30 points) |
Describes/explains numerous relevant concepts from this course to discuss the case, and all concepts are well-integrated into the overall case study. Analysis is comprehensive. Strongly relates case to the central themes/topics and concepts in the course. (31 to 35 points) |
|
Relevant Writing of Appropriate Length: Includes Accuracy of Document-ing Sources (10 points)
|
Fails to accurately use APA to format sources in the body of the paper and in the REFERENCES section and fails to accurately/fully document sources within the paper. Overly wordy or not providing enough information. (0 to 5 points) Note: A failure to document sources can result in a score of zero (-0-) on the paper if egregious, or at most 50%, no matter how many points the paper would have otherwise earned in the other categories. (See syllabus) |
Fails to accurately use APA to format sources in the body of the paper and in the REFERENCES section and fails to accurately/fully document some sources within the paper. Some passages either overly wordy or not providing enough information. (6 points) |
Fails to accurately format sources in the body of the paper and/or in the REFERENCES section but accurately documents all sources within the paper. (8 points) |
Almost always accurately uses APA to format sources in the body of the paper and in the REFERENCES section and accurately/fully documents sources within the paper. (9 to 10 points) |
|
Clarity/ Formatting (10 points) |
Writing unclear. Provides no introduction. Fails to follow case study outline, and/or syllabus instructions on formatting and/or APA formatting. (0 to 5 points) |
Numerous passages unclear and/or not providing enough information. Fails to follow case study outline or syllabus instructions on formatting or APA formatting. (6 points) |
Some passages unclear. Often follows case study outline, syllabus instructions on formatting and APA formatting, but not throughout the paper. (8 points) |
Almost all passages clear. Follows case study outline, syllabus instructions on formatting and APA formatting throughout the paper. (9 to 10 points) |
