lgls1101 case study two pages

/in /by

WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT

There will be a written assignment involving material covered in Chapter Five – Torts, to be submitted. This assignment involves a hypothetical dog bite case which occurs in a Sports Bar.


Please see the attachments for the case itself. The case analysis should be two pages. It must includes the

Facts: who suing whom and for what

Issue: a legal question which is the foundation of a case. It requires a court’s decision.

Holdings: a court’s determination of a matter of law based on the issue presented in the particular case.

Also please answer these questions in the case.

Is the bar liable for the dog’s actions in jumping into the stands and injuring Mr. Roseman?

Is it a defense that the dog was not vicious and never bit anyone before?

Does it matter that this was the first time the dog went into the end zone stand to retrieve the ball?

discussion board post for management class

/in /by

Visit a fast-food restaurant, coffee shop, or any other business as long as it lends itself to answering the assigned questions.

When responding to the questions below, be specific and support your responses with detailed information from the video.

1. Identify the restaurant and location you visited.

2. Describe the external store appearance (including shrubbery, cleanliness, and upkeep of outer building and parking lot) and the drive-through if used (including ease, speed, and accuracy of service).

3. Describe the cleanliness of the inner store (including tables, floors, and restrooms) and service if used (including ease, speed, and accuracy of service).

4. Describe the employee factors (including appearance, friendliness, and efficiency), the service factors (including speed and accuracy) and the food quality (including taste, freshness, temperature, and portion size).

5. Identify the areas you found to be weak and use what you have learned in this course to describe the corrective actions that you would take for each area identified. Support your recommendations with specific examples for improvement.

understanding the court system 6

/in /by

The U.S. Court System is a complex system that includes both federal and state-level courts. The federal system includes the judicial branch of the government. This system is designed to help society interpret the U.S. Constitution and provide guidelines for society. Court cases may concern many different topics and have an unlimited number of outcomes.

assignment international pricing strategies submit assignment

/in /by

Watch the video, you may need to push the Play button to begin the video.

Then, research international pricing compared to domestic pricing and discuss various variables used in setting price of product sold internationally. Then write a 2 to 3 page paper addressing these topics. Your paper should be in APA format.

answers the question in art

/in /by

Hi, There

the class is an art, the assignment is about answering the question that I will upload it here and all the details going to be there ..thanks

system analysis amp design powerpoint

/in /by

Instructions

Scenario: You have been directed by your project manager to describe the software development life cycle for system development to a potential stakeholder. You decide that you will create a presentation for the stakeholder.

For your presentation, you will do the following.

  • Create a six-slide original PowerPoint presentation.
  • Include a title slide and a reference slide. These slides do not count toward the six-slide minimum requirement.
  • Describe the software development life cycle as a whole.
  • Identify and explain each of the different phases of the software development life cycle.
  • Include at least one graphic or image that correlates to the content. Remember to cite your graphic(s) or image(s).
  • Include at least one reference in your presentation other than your graphic or image references.
  • Follow APA style formatting and guidelines.

Remember to compare your presentation with the rubric before submitting it.

american gov week 1 discussion 1 respond to 3 classmates 100 words total

/in /by

Your peer responses should be substantive and at least 100 words each. Demonstrate your understanding of the topic by respectfully asking questions, raising new points for consideration, or requesting clarification from your fellow students. For example, you may want to compare your real-world examples to those of your classmates, see how they are similar or different, and discuss why.

homework logistics management

/in /by

  • must mention question number clearly in their answer.
  • Avoid plagiarism, the work should be in your own words, copying from students or other resources without proper referencing will result in ZERO marks. No exceptions.
  • All answered must be typed using Times New Roman (size 12, double-spaced) font. No pictures containing text will be accepted and will be considered plagiarism).

integrating sources 3

/in /by

1. Review your sources and select a source that will support a key point in your essay.

2. In 1-2 sentences, clearly state what the point is that you are trying to make in this particular section of your project.

3. What information from the source you selected in step 1 supports this point? You may quote or summarize that source below.

4. Explain how the information provided in question three supports your point. How does this information also support the overall argument in your essay?

SECTION 2

  1. In your own words, identify the argument of your peer’s persuasive essay. What are they aiming to prove?
  2. Has your peer adequately addressed opposing viewpoints?
  3. Which of the summaries (or which sections of the summaries) could use more clarification? How could your peer’s summaries be improved? Please paste an example and, if appropriate, offer your own edits.
  4. Has your peer provided adequate credentialing information? If so, how can you tell the source is credible? If not, what could your peer add to note the reliability of the source?
  5. Do the sources your peer describes in the annotated bibliography connect to their argument in a clear and easy-to-understand manner? If so, how so? If not, what are some ways in which your peer could strengthen those connections?
  6. Does your peer acknowledge a counter-argument in one of the annotations? If a counterargument is presented, do they provide a persuasive rebuttal? If no counterargument is presented, can you anticipate some of the objections your peer should take into consideration?
  7. Evaluate the sources your peer has selected. Which sources do you find to be the strongest? Why do you think they are strong, and how do they support your peer’s key points? Are there ways the sources could support those key points that your peer has overlooked? Be specific. (WILL SEND THE FULL DISCUSSION ONCE WE GET STARTED)

economy about war affect the curve of production possibilities in germany and for the invisible hand to work and the differences in absolute advantages

/in /by

use Times New Roman (size 12, double-spaced ) for all answer. word format only. no matching ratio.