project creating a power point presentation on the history of sociology.

/in /by

The first semester long project for this course is the project creating a power point presentation on the history of sociology. In this presentation, you will want to address the origins of sociology, the important early theorists and the theories contributed by them, and how sociology as a field of inquiry has evolved and progressed. You are free to add any elements to the power point that you want; video files, web links, audio files, etc.
Sociology Project Outline
 

  1. Introduction
    • History of Sociology general overview
    • Thesis statement
  2. Classical Sociological Theory
    • Aguste Comte
      • Historical and Epistemological stages
    • Industrial revolution
    • Classical sociological theorists
  • Sociology as a discipline
    • Early schools of thought
      • Karl Marx
      • Max Weber
      • Emile Durkheim
      • Georg Simmel
  1. Sociology in the Nineteenth Century
    • Social, Intellectual and political conditions – Positivism
    • Interpretive sociology or anti-positivism
  2. Modern Sociology
    • Developments in social phenomena
    • Early twentieth century intellectuals

 

  1. Theories
    • Critical Theory – Explanatory, practical, and normative
    • Social Exchange Theory
    • Classical Social Theory
    • Other theories
  • Classification of social reality
    • Cultural customs
    • Social structures
    • Social perception
    • Social interactions
    • Social sciences
  • Conclusion
    • Summary
    • Conclusion statement
  1. References

 

causal factors that can and will contribute to criminal behavior

/in /by

Using Microsoft Word document and or Google docs review the video link then respond to question. Be sure to conduct a critical analysis of the question: 
Searching for Causes:
There are a variety of causal factors that can and will contribute to criminal behavior. According to your textbook, “A theory is a set of interrelated propositions that attempt to describe, explain, predict, and ultimately control some class of events.”
*Review the video documentary on Ed Kemper and/or the video of his interview from the links below.” Complete the tasks at the end of the page.
 
Ed Kemper Interview Link (Links to an external site.)
Back-up link in the event you are using a different electronic device.
Ed Kemper Documentary Link (Links to an external site.)
Tasks:

  1. DescribeEd Kemper’s (Kemper) criminal activities and any additional background information you can research about him.
  2. Discuss how the various theoretical schools noted below would attempt to explain his behavior. For example, biological theorists might argue that Kemper was born to be a serial murderer. However, sociological theorists would argue that Kemper was shaped by his environment. You may combine any of theories to explain this offender’s behavior.  Remember to start your response with a high-level overview of the facts of the case.

*The eight general theories explaining criminal behavior are noted below:

  • Classical
  • Biological
  • Psychobiological
  • Psychological
  • Sociological
  • Social Process
  • Conflict
  • Emergent

General Guidelines for the assignment:
Since you are the future leaders of tomorrow, the questions are meant to invoke your critical thinking skills.  Be sure to submit a substantive response to earn maximum points. Start with an introductory paragraph to give the reader a clear picture of the topic. Assume that the reader has no knowledge of the subject matter and that you are being tasked with explaining the concepts. Subsequent paragraphs should support your topic with researched information from your textbook, outside resources, and your independent assessment.  Be sure to end with a concluding paragraph and cite your sources.
 
 

University of California Poverty Essay

/in /by

Question Description

Dear Intro to Sociology People:
The past two weeks we talked about different classical sociological theorists and sociological frameworks.
Based on course readings and material covered during lecture, you will have a choice of two essay topics. Choose only one of the following options (and clearly indicate which option, #1 or #2, you are writing about):
Option 1 (700-900 words): Whose Table do you Join?
I want you to consider the following scenario: Karl Marx, Emile Durkheim, Max Weber, and Georg Simmel walk into a cafeteria. They each sit at separate tables.
Whose table do you join? Why?
After you briefly justify (50-100 words) why you selected that particular theorist, please write up an imaginary conversation between you and them. What kinds of questions would you want to ask? How would they respond to your questions? The goal here is to pretend you are having a real back-and-forth conversation (at the lunch table) with one of the classical sociological theorists. Throughout your dialogue with Simmel, Durkheim, Weber, or Marx, you must demonstrate a thorough understanding of their key ideas. Your creativity will be rewarded.
This essay must be between 700-900 words. Submit your finished essays to our Canvas site before 9am, Friday, November 1st.
Option 2 (700-900 words): Applying Theory to Social Problems
Pick a current social problem (student loan debt, poverty, drug and substance abuse, environmental pollution, etc). In your view, which of the classical sociological theorists’ ideas that we covered in lecture is most useful toward understanding the persistence of the social problem you identified? Apply and discuss at least one of the theorists’ concepts to
illustrate your argument.
This essay must be between 700-900 words. Submit your finished essays to our Canvas site before 9am, Friday, November 1st.

Sociological Theorists and Their Ideas Discussion

/in /by

Question Description

Based on course readings and lectures, I want you to consider the following scenario: Karl Marx and Georg Simmel walk into a cafeteria. They sit at the same table. And they begin talking with each other.
What would Marx and Simmel talk about? What do their theories about society have in common? How do their theories differ?
The goal here is to pretend you are observing/overhearing a back-and-forth conversation (at the lunch table) between two of sociology’s classical theorists. As you construct this imaginary dialogue, you must demonstrate a thorough understanding of each theorist’s key ideas (which were covered during lecture and course readings). Your creativity will be rewarded.
This essay must be between 600-700 words.

Classical Sociological Theorists and Sociological Frameworks Writing Paper

/in /by

Question Description

Please must use the PPT and the files attached in your essay
Dear Intro to Sociology People:
The past two weeks we talked about different classical sociological theorists and sociological frameworks.
Based on course readings and material covered during lecture, you will have a choice of two possible essay topics. Choose only one of the following options (and clearly indicate which option, #1 or #2, you are writing about):
Option 1 (500-600 words): Whose Table do you Join?
I want you to consider the following scenario: Karl Marx, Emile Durkheim, Max Weber, and Georg Simmel walk into a cafeteria. They each sit at separate tables.
Whose table do you join? Why?
That is what I want you to write about this week. Which theorist’s table do you join, and why?
This essay must be between 500-600 words. Submit your finished essays to our Canvas site before 9am, Friday, May 3rd.
Option 2 (500-600 words): What is missing from view?
Karl Marx, Emile Durkheim, Max Weber, and Georg Simmel are four theorists who are almost always taught in Introductory Sociology classes. But these four theorists do not represent the sum total of possible thought about Social life and its operations. When thinking about the theoretical ideas these four theorists advanced, what topics seem to be missing? What Sociological perspectives seem to be missing from their theories? What are their blindspots?

Different Classical Sociological Theorists and Sociological Frameworks Essay

/in /by

Question Description

Dear Intro to Sociology People:
The past two weeks we talked about different classical sociological theorists and sociological frameworks.
Based on course readings and material covered during lecture, you will have a choice of two possible essay topics. Choose only one of the following options (and clearly indicate which option, #1 or #2, you are writing about):
Option 1 (500-600 words): Whose Table do you Join?
I want you to consider the following scenario: Karl Marx, Emile Durkheim, Max Weber, and Georg Simmel walk into a cafeteria. They each sit at separate tables.
Whose table do you join? Why?
That is what I want you to write about this week. Which theorist’s table do you join, and why?
This essay must be between 500-600 words. Reading materials has been posted. Please add word count and work cited in the essay.

UCI Sociological Theorists and Their Ideas Essay

/in /by

Question Description

Option #1
I want you to consider the following scenario: Karl Marx and Georg Simmel walk into a cafeteria. They sit at the same table. And they begin talking with each other.
What would Marx and Simmel talk about? What do their theories about society have in common? How do their theories differ?
The goal here is to pretend you are observing/overhearing a back-and-forth conversation (at the lunch table) between two of sociology’s classical theorists. As you construct this imaginary dialogue, you must demonstrate a thorough understanding of each theorist’s key ideas (which were covered during lecture and course readings). Your creativity will be rewarded.
This essay must be between 600- 700 words.
lecture slides of Karl Marx and Georg Simmel is attached.
attached Model is scenario of Karl Marx and Max Weber, not Karl Marx and Georg Simmel. model just give you some idea how the essay should be.

Sociological Theorists and Frameworks Essay

/in /by

Question Description

Dear Intro to Sociology People:
The past two weeks we talked about different classical sociological theorists and sociological frameworks.
This week’s essay will include three parts.
PART I (300-400 words): Whose Table do you Join?
I want you to consider the following scenario: Karl Marx, Emile Durkheim, and Georg Simmel walk into a cafeteria. They each sit at separate tables.
Whose table do you join? Why?
That is what I want you to write about this week. Which theorist’s table do you join, and why?
While citing specific material mentioned during lecture, your written response to PART I must be between 300-400 words.
PART II (200-300 words): Anna on the Life Course Perspective
This week Anna delivered lecture content that focused on the Life Course Perspective.
In 200-300 words, please identify the key points Anna made during her lecture on the Life Course Perspective. What was the most interesting idea that Anna discussed during her lecture? Why do you think that?
PART III (200-300 words): Archi on W.E.B. Du Bois
This week Archi delivered a lecture about W.E.B. Du Bois and some of his famous concepts.
In 200-300 words, please identify the key points Archi made during his lecture on W.E.B. Du Bois. What was the most interesting idea that Archi discussed during his lecture? Why do you think that?
*******
Please submit your finished responses to our Canvas site before 9am, Friday, February 8th.

Sociological Theorists, sociology homework help

/in /by

Question Description

Anyone interested in typing a ten page final paper for me? The two theorists the paper is based on is Karl Marx and Weber.
Final Paper: 40%
You should write a final paper that is 10 pages long. The paper should focus on the ideas of one, but no more than two individual theorists. You should describe her or his ideas and a case with which you will illustrate their ideas. You may include material that is appropriately cited from the readings, but you should go beyond the ideas presented there or those accessible in online encyclopedias. Papers will be graded based on the clarity of writing, your ability to accurately convey the theorist’s ideas, your effective use of outside source material, the creativity of your prose and your ideas. The final paper should be double-spaced using Times New Roman 12pt font. You must include a minimum of five (5) citations total. At least three (3) of these citations must come from peer-reviewed sources. There is no limit as to how many citations you may include in your final paper. I will be available to you throughout the semester during office hours or by appointment to discuss the topic and format of your paper. It is always a good idea to bounce your ideas off of me during the quarter so that we are on the same page about what to expect.
THIS IS A Sociology class

BU 7401 Trine University Leadership in Action and Management Skills Essay

/in /by

Individual written assignment Assessment Type, Word Count & Weighting 1000 words 25% of module grade B: Learning Outcomes 1. Analyse the evolution and nature of contemporary management and leadership and the theoretical and philosophical underpinnings C: Assessment Task Write a critically reflective account of your personal understanding of what it means to be a manager. Your account should draw on both relevant academic theory and examples of your own experience and practice. D: Specific Criteria/Guidance There is no one correct way to approach this assessment. Essentially you are being asked: What does being a manager mean to you? Note that this deliberately leaves the question of whether leadership and management are synonymous, related or separate concepts open to your personal experience and academic judgment. However, please take account of the following guidance. 1. Your work will be marked according to the following criteria (please see the marking rubric later in this brief for details of what each requirement covers in relation to the task): • Knowledge and understanding of management, identity and/or leadership theory and practice (30%) • Critical analysis and interpretation of management theory and practice (40%) • Critical reflection, personal and professional evaluation and application (30%) 2. The key to this brief is to be able to integrate and synthesise relevant academic theories with reflection on your own experience and practice. • This means using each (theory and experience/practice) to inform, interpret, analyse and evaluate the other. • For example – How might a particular theory help to explain your personal management practice or experience? • For example – How can your personal management practice and experience help to evaluate a particular theory? 3. It is usually more effective, particularly for short assignments, to aim for an in-depth analysis with a narrow focus, rather than trying to cover many different things. • You are not expected to provide a comprehensive account of your management career, nor of theories and practices of management and/or leadership. • You will be given credit for being able to select appropriate and relevant materials and integrate them effectively. • For example, you may choose to discuss a particular event which has shaped your understanding of management, or use a particular theory as a lens with which to examine your personal understanding and management practice. 4. Relevant academic theories should include at least one of the following (more are discussed in the module materials): • Theories of management • Theories of identity • Theories of leadership 5. Your personal experience and practice may include: • Experience of being a manager • Experience of being managed • Experience of observing managers • Accounts of managers and management that you have read or heard about 6. In your account you may wish to consider one or more of the following: • Has your understanding of management changed? In what ways, how and why? • Has your understanding been affected by your initial MBA studies? In what ways, how and why? • Do you see yourself as a manager? Why? • Do you see yourself as a leader? Why? • In what ways does your experience of being a manager (or observing managers) reflect theories of management and leadership? In what ways does your experience challenge theories? E: Key Resources Including (a minimum of 10) recommended texts and peer-reviewed electronic sources which you expect students to use. Please refer to the recommended and further reading on the module pages and module handbook, but expected sources relevant for this assessment submission would include: The following are key texts which will be frequently referenced throughout the module: Aswathappa, K., (2013), Human Resource Management: Text and Cases,Tata McGraw-Hill Education Beard, C., & Wilson, J. P. (2006). Experiential Learning. (2nd ed.). London, UK: Kogan Page. Bratton, J., (2015), Introduction to Work and Organisational Behaviour, 3 rd Edition, Palgrave Buchanan, D.A., & Huczynski, A. A. (2010). Organizational Behaviour. (7th ed.). Harlow, UK: FT Prentice Hall. Burnes, R. (2009). Managing Change. (5th ed.). Harlow, UK: FT Prentice Hall. Cameron, S. (2004). The MBA Handbook: Skills for Mastering Management. (5th ed.). Harlow, UK: FT Prentice Hall. Clegg,S.R., Kornberger, M. and Pitsis, T.,(2011) Managing and Organisations, Sage.DOI: 10.1177/0018726708092403, Volume 61(6): 763–782 Gold, J., Thorpe, R., & Mumford, A. (2010). Leadership and Management Development, (5th ed.). London, UK: CIPD. Harrison, R. (2005). Learning and Development. (4th ed.). London, UK: CIPD. Kelliher,C., Truss, D. and Mankin,C., (2012), Strategic Human Resource Management, Oxford Press Kelly, S.,(2008), Leadership: a categorical mistake?, Human Relations Kendall, D., (2017),Sociology in Our Times, 11th Edition, Cengage Mats Alvesson (2013) Understanding Organisational Culture, Routledge Murdock, A., & Scott, C. (2002). Personal Effectiveness. (3rd ed.). Oxford, UK: Butterworth Heinemann. Pedlar, M., Burgoyne, J., & Boydell, T. (2007). A Manager’s Guide to Self-Development. (5th ed.). Maidenhead, UK: Prentice Hall. Raelin J. A. (2000). Work Based Learning: the New Frontier of Management Development. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Routledge, C., & Carmichael, J. (2007). Personal Development and Management Skills. London, UK: CIPD. Silva, A.,(2016),What is Leadership?, Journal of Business Studies Quarterly, 8,1. Thomson, A. (2001). Changing Patterns of Management Development. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. Watson, G., & Reissner, S. (Eds.). (2010). Developing Skills for Business Leadership. London, UK: CIPD. Weinstein, K. (2005). Action Learning: a Practical Guide. Aldershot, UK: Gower. Western, S., (2013), Leadership: A critical text, Sage. Whetton, D., & Cameron, K. D. (2007). Developing Management Skills. (7th ed.). London, UK: Pearson Education. Winstanley, D. (2005). Personal Effectiveness. London, UK: CIPD. F: Submission Guidance • You must submit assessments in Microsoft Word format. • The file must be no larger than 40MB. • Your writing is expected to conform to Standard English in terms of spelling, syntax and grammar. • You must include your Assessment Number (J Number) in the header or footer. • Include your word count at the end of the assignment or the front cover. • Set up your page for A4 paper in portrait style. • The font size must be a minimum of point 12 Calibri (or equivalent) for the body of the assessment and footnotes must be 2 points smaller. • Line spacing in the body of the assessment must be 1.5 lines. • Number the pages consecutively. • Students should submit work before 12 noon on the deadline date electronically via Moodle. Please follow the ‘Turnitin submission’ link on the module space and follow the on-screen instructions, paying particular attention to any specific instructions for each assignment. • You must submit your work with the following details written on the first page: – Title of your work Module title and code Module Leader and Seminar Tutor (if relevant) Number of words Your student assessment number (J Number) Student work that does not have this information on will not be identifiable after marking has taken place and risks being recorded as a non-submission. G: Academic Integrity and Penalties It is your responsibility to ensure that you are familiar with all of the information contained in this brief as failure to do this may impact on your achievement. Please refer to the various Assessment Guidance below for detailed information on: • Academic Integrity • APA Reference Guide • Excess Word Count Penalties • University Generic Marking Criteria • Late Work Penalties …