Howard v. Wilson trial (p. 186), legal homework
Howard v. Wilson (p. 186): The Mississippi Supreme Court holds that even though the plaintiff’s complaint sought to characterize the defendant’s ‘violent attack” as an instance of negligence, the complaint really alleged a claim of battery that was time-barred because of the operation of the applicable statute of limitations on intentional tort claims.
Need assignment help for this question?
If you need assistance with writing your essay, we are ready to help you!
OUR PROCESS
Order
Payment
Writing
Delivery
Why Choose Us: Cost-efficiency, Plagiarism free, Money Back Guarantee, On-time Delivery, Total Сonfidentiality, 24/7 Support, 100% originality
Point for Discussion: Why did the plaintiff, Wilson, was so desperate to have the court buy the argument that her claim was a negligence claim rather than a battery claim? Explain the case and elements needed to be met for the claims.
100 word thanks
