Need business and finance help with the Managin Risk-Human Factor
Please answer these question.
This is a 2 part question and each question needs to be answered separately.
Need assignment help for this question?
If you need assistance with writing your essay, we are ready to help you!
OUR PROCESS
Order
Payment
Writing
Delivery
Why Choose Us: Cost-efficiency, Plagiarism free, Money Back Guarantee, On-time Delivery, Total Сonfidentiality, 24/7 Support, 100% originality
Question #1.
“Risk Balance of Project Portfolios” Please respond to the following:
- Consider an organization where you work or have worked. Discuss the risk balance or policy that senior management plays for a risky project. If you have not worked in such an environment, discuss a current project that has appeared in the news media.
- Using the example from the previous discussion, assess the senior management’s developing organizational capabilities.
This question needs to be answered using the media, it also requires a minimum of 200 words.
Question #2
Managing Risk – The Human Factor
Evaluate the project you identified in question #1 , in more detail by completing the tasks listed below. Note that you will need to conduct further research on the project using the Internet as a resource in order to address all aspects of this assignment.
Write a four to five (4-5) page paper in which you:
- Evaluate the project scope.
- Determine the two (2) major risks associated with the project. Explain each of the identified risks.
- Examine the levels of uncertainty and complexity for the project.
- Analyze the type of project learning that is addressed. Justify your response.
- Examine the organizational mind-set and explain its impact on the project.
- Propose changes you would recommend to the infrastructure for lessons learned.
- Use at least three (3) quality references. Note: Wikipedia and other Websites do not quality as academic resources.
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
- Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
- Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.
The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:
- Analyze the project risk identification and assessment processes.
- Examine the various types of project risks.
- Analyze the process for diagnosing uncertainty and complexity in projects.
- Evaluate the types of learning in projects.
- Evaluate the organizational infrastructure for managing high-uncertainty projects.
- Use technology and information resources to research issues in managing project risk.
- Write clearly and concisely about managing project risk using proper writing mechanics.
Attached below is the rubric grading pathway. Please follow the rubric as youy do the paper.
|
Assignment 5: Managing Risk – The Human Factor |
|||||
|
Criteria |
Unacceptable Below 60% F |
Meets Minimum Expectations 60-69% D |
Fair 70-79% C |
Proficient 80-89% B |
Exemplary 90-100% A |
|
1. Evaluate the project scope. Weight: 10% |
Did not submit or incompletely evaluated the project scope. |
Insufficiently evaluated the project scope. |
Partially evaluated the project scope. |
Satisfactorily evaluated the project scope. |
Thoroughly evaluated the project scope. |
|
2. Determine the two (2) major risks associated with the project. Explain each of the identified risks. |
Did not submit or incompletely determined the two (2) major risks associated with the project. Did not submit or incompletely explained each of the identified risks. |
Insufficiently determined the two (2) major risks associated with the project. Insufficiently explained each of the identified risks. |
Partially determined the two (2) major risks associated with the project. Partially explained each of the identified risks. |
Satisfactorily determined the two (2) major risks associated with the project. Satisfactorily explained each of the identified risks. |
Thoroughly determined the two (2) major risks associated with the project. Thoroughly explained each of the identified risks. |
|
3. Examine the levels of uncertainty and complexity for the project. Weight: 15% |
Did not submit or incompletely examined the levels of uncertainty and complexity for the project. |
Insufficiently examined the levels of uncertainty and complexity for the project. |
Partially examined the levels of uncertainty and complexity for the project. |
Satisfactorily examined the levels of uncertainty and complexity for the project. |
Thoroughly examined the levels of uncertainty and complexity for the project. |
|
4. Analyze the type of project learning that is addressed. Justify your response. Weight: 15% |
Did not submit or incompletely analyzed the type of project learning that is addressed. Did not submit or incompletely justified your response. |
Insufficiently analyzed the type of project learning that is addressed. Insufficiently justified your response. |
Partially analyzed the type of project learning that is addressed. Partially justified your response. |
Satisfactorily analyzed the type of project learning that is addressed. Satisfactorily justified your response. |
Thoroughly analyzed the type of project learning that is addressed. Thoroughly justified your response. |
|
5. Examine the organizational mind-set and explain its impact on the project. Weight: 15% |
Did not submit or incompletely examined the organizational mind-set and did not submit or incompletely explained its impact on the project. |
Insufficiently examined the organizational mind-set and insufficiently explained its impact on the project. |
Partially examined the organizational mind-set and partially explained its impact on the project. |
Satisfactorily examined the organizational mind-set and satisfactorily explained its impact on the project. |
Thoroughly examined the organizational mind-set and thoroughly explained its impact on the project. |
|
6. Propose changes you would recommend to the infrastructure for lessons learned. Weight: 15% |
Did not submit or incompletely proposed changes you would recommend to the infrastructure for lessons learned. |
Insufficiently proposed changes you would recommend to the infrastructure for lessons learned. |
Partially proposed changes you would recommend to the infrastructure for lessons learned. |
Satisfactorily proposed changes you would recommend to the infrastructure for lessons learned. |
Thoroughly proposed changes you would recommend to the infrastructure for lessons learned. |
|
7. 3 references Weight: 5% |
No references provided |
Does not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices. |
Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices. |
Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices. |
Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices. |
|
8. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements Weight: 10% |
More than 8 errors present |
7-8 errors present |
5-6 errors present |
3-4 errors present |
0-2 errors present |
